I’m creating a map of an irregularly shaped piece of real estate that is ~100 acres. It is raw land with some clearings and some tree canopy. At its lowest, it runs along a river (for ~1 mile) and has some rolling hills as you go away from the river. There is a home on it, but I’m not really concerned with that (client will be tearing it down).
The goal is a preliminary survey that allows for some measurement of: acreage of specific areas; elevation changes / grade of other areas; and general, misc measurements. It will also be nice to have a good, detailed map of the land.
As the title of the thread suggests, I’m wondering which of the two settings will produce the better map:
- Enhanced 3d Crosshatch @ 70%/60% @ 320’
- Regular @ 72%/72% @ 250’
Or, if neither of those is ideal, happy to take any suggestions.